A close-up of a Ferrari Formula 1 engineer wearing a red headset and race suit, adjusting his collar with a serious expression. The background shows other Ferrari team members and a Formula 1 car inside the garage, with digital telemetry screens visible.

“This is unacceptable”: Fred Vasseur’s cold fury after the Chinese GP

The Chinese Grand Prix delivered its share of twists and turns for Ferrari, marked by mixed performances and media controversies. Team principal Fred Vasseur did not hold back in criticizing the event’s television coverage.​

A Mixed Race for Ferrari

Lewis Hamilton, after securing a brilliant pole position and winning the sprint race, faced a more challenging main race, initially finishing sixth. His teammate, Charles Leclerc, crossed the line in fifth place. However, their satisfaction was short-lived: both drivers were disqualified post-race for technical infringements. Hamilton was penalized for excessive skid block wear, while Leclerc’s car was found to be under the minimum weight limit.

A Media Controversy Ignites the Paddock

Beyond the technical setbacks, a controversy erupted regarding the television broadcast of the race. Fred Vasseur sharply criticized how Formula 1 presented a radio exchange between Hamilton and the team. According to Vasseur, the broadcast omitted Hamilton’s initial suggestion to let Leclerc pass, providing a skewed portrayal of the situation. He stated, “This is a joke from FOM (Formula One Management), because the first call came from Lewis to swap. Lewis suggested it.”

Formula 1’s Response

In response to the criticism, Formula 1 asserted that there was no intention to present a misleading narrative regarding Ferrari’s team radio. A spokesperson clarified, “Due to other situations developing during the race, the message from Lewis was not played, but this was not intentional.” ​

Reflections on Media Management in F1

This incident raises questions about communication management in Formula 1 and how information is presented to the public. As a devoted F1 fan, I wonder whether these editorial choices serve the sport or unnecessarily fuel controversies. We’d love to hear your thoughts: do you believe the current media coverage of F1 accurately reflects on-track events, or should it be revised for greater transparency?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Zeen is a next generation WordPress theme. It’s powerful, beautifully designed and comes with everything you need to engage your visitors and increase conversions.