As 2026 approaches, Formula 1 faces a complex web of technical and political battles. What should the future engine formula be? Who benefits from tweaks to the rules? And can the FIA keep all manufacturers aligned while protecting the spectacle?
The 2026 regulations are locked in… almost
In recent high-level meetings, teams made it clear: scrapping the 2026 rules is off the table. Audi, Honda, and Mercedes insisted the framework must stay intact — it aligns with their commitments to electrification and sustainability.
For these brands, regulatory certainty is essential to justify massive R&D efforts. Sudden U-turns would compromise not only strategies but potentially entire factory programs.
Power balance: Electric vs combustion
While V10 nostalgia lingers, F1’s future lies with hybrid turbo power. But the balance between electric deployment and internal combustion remains controversial.
Red Bull has raised concerns about too much electric reliance, which could lead to boring, fuel-saving races. Mercedes disagrees, insisting changes now would undermine years of development.
One team domination: a real fear
The paddock remembers 2014. One team nailing the rules can derail competition for years. To prevent this, the FIA proposes flexible development allowances — more dyno time and budget headroom for underperformers.
Still, it’s a politically loaded solution, and not all teams are on board.
“In the interest of the sport” — or of each team?
That phrase — “in the interest of the sport” — is now at the heart of every debate. When does it mean protecting the show? And when does it disguise protecting a technical edge?
These decisions will shape F1’s next era. And with just 10 months to go, the battle is as much off-track as it is on the asphalt.